Smoking lounges can be setup in every place, at frequent intervals and with this smoking can be completely banned in all public places. I suggest the government to take action immediately and stop that puff of smoke from coming out of a person’s mouth and make them happy and invincible from smoke! Many governments have introduced smoking bans. Too much littering. Cigarette smoking should be banned. 2. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. They are bad for the environment. They can affect businesses. ...Why Smoking Should be Banned Undoubtedly, there will always be subjects of controversy. They can do whatever they choose to do. On the same note, the public health concern is on the rise due to cigarette smoking. 1. Tommy on November 07, 2018: Don't smoke EVER. 2008). That's life, and it's sad. It should be what is considered best for the majority of people’s welfare, which is for smoking to be banned. No one should have the right to say what others can or cannot do with their own bodies! Smoking should be completely banned in the UK, according to a top medical journal. People around a smoker can also smoke by second hand smoking. They even took flavored cigarettes away from us adults because they SAY it encourages younger smokers...But where's their scientific proof? By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Smoking is linked to mental health problems such as mild depression, listfulness, anxiety and stress. Whether you should be allowed to smoke in a bar should be determined by the owner of that bar, not by busybody bureaucrats who think they know how to live everyone’s lives for them. If they want to put tar in their lungs they can. Just because the ones who abuse this privilege died from smoking does not mean it should be banned. Also anyone who thinks banning smoking will stop people from smoking is delusional. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, children are susceptible to the effects of secondhand smoke because they are growing and developing. Hardly ever is it pinpointed on fancy TV commercials or on billboards that the costs of smoking are far greater than the cost of a pack of cigarettes. There are plenty of things that cause cancer. Cigarette smoking should be banned. They can do what they want with their bodies. In my opinion, Banning cigarette smoking is beneficial in any case. The tax payer i.e YOU. Nicotine medications can be expensive. Banning smoking would be an exercise in way too much government control. Children will continue to take it up if they see that it is being done openly by adults and their peers. The community on this is so aids why is veryone somean tome just kys nerd s no one cares about smoking, The community is great I loved the krsipy jrme donuts ti waws jgreat tot be a here atr dsigtht so thaj k uyou ofor ecerything u have done for me and goodblye because you afrre goinhg to need toit to pkya thyer egame, Listen all mummy is yummy haha get it it rimes lol. You have NO RIGHT to make health decisions for me, just like I have no right to tell you what to eat because you MIGHT get heart disease. Innocent bystanders are also affected. Also, the nicotine inside is very addictive. There are so many people who are already addicted to smoking so banning it altogether would be a cruel thing to do to them. It also has great negative effects on reproductive health, Causing infertility, Stillbirths, Low birth weight, And sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). 8.6 million people are ill because of smoking or the smoke. Overall, I think that the world would be a much better place without cigarettes. If smoking should be banned because it causes cancer or kills people, why arent fast food restaraunts banned. I'd like to know why the people don't raise hell and do something to stop them! I feel like I have to hide out like a common criminal just because I happen to enjoy smoking VERY much. It should be our choice...No one else should be telling people what they can or can't do! All of this can be easily avoided, What is the point. So without cigarettes there would be no jobs, no funds for new buildings and the government would not be making a profit anymore. This is why I think smoking should be illegal. If smoking was banned the consumers who were unable to quite smoking would be forced into buying black market cigarettes therefore being sent to prison. It just happens and nothing people do or say will stop them if they feel like smoking! If people who say they should be banned actually paid attention or did research on what they were talking about then they would know this. Honestly its just not your choice..Or your problem what people do to their bodies. Then, We should put them into rehabilitation to help them find other interests and positive passion. About the lung cancer - the truth is that no doctor can tell whether it is caused by smoking or not. But in a place where they cannot conceivably control the smoke they are putting out from getting to others. Vote and join the debate! Children exposed to secondhand smoke have increased risks of sudden infant death syndrome, middle ear infec… Consumption drops thanks to the ban. Tobacco is responsible for nearly one in five deaths in the whole country; also the smoke contains monoxide that reduces oxygen- carrying ability of … Cigarette smoking has led to increased health concerns even to the nonsmokers. Why don't be ban everything that is a possible danger and threat to us, and that could potentially lead to death?Smoking is only harmful in excessive amounts. On the other end of the continuum are the people who think that smoking is an … Why is that cigarettes are not added to the most dangerous illegal drugs substances, and in addition did you know that nicotine is one of the most addicting substances. 2) it has absolutely no benefits. Smoking doesn’t just affect the smoker, but also other people. Smoking is very harmful to others and an average of 400,000 people die of it a year. I dont understand why people think its their job to take care of other peoples health. Smoking should be banned because: 1. Alcohol probably kills more than smoking but they won't try taking that away again! Second-hand Smoke Isn't as Harmful as Once Thought I've experienced the tragedy of watching loved ones fall victim to the disease of tobacco addiction. Tobacco is a legal drug and one of the main public health issues: the World Health Organization claims that tobacco is the single greatest cause of preventable death globally. Go ahead. It's MY body and I should have every right to smoke if I want to! They are bad for your colon, your heart, your lungs, and every other part of your body. You people make me so angry, stick to making your own choices instead of trying to lock people up for smoking a leaf! Same way junk food is only harmful in large quantities. Not only it's harmful to smokers, But it also affects non-smoking persons (so-called passive smokers), Who experience the same harmful consequences. Thank you. 1) in the long run, Smoking contributes to air pollution. So, just because you don't like the sight of a smoking person that doesn't mean he or she must be punished for it. It also affects all the people around those who smoke because when people smoke in pubic the smoke travels everywhere through the air, and the negative effects of this smoke affects all living, breathing creatures. The reason why smoking should not be banned is because 1) Smoking relaxes people. Although it is very addicting, smoking is harmful to others and had a large death toll. Smoking gives many illnesses like breathing problems, bad heart conditions, oral cancer, high blood pressure and much more. And subsequently and gradually stricter regulations can be brought on production and sale, finally leading to a total ban, … What you're proposing is just as ridiculous. Its not your problem. If you saw the ingredients in them you would change your mind about smoking cigarettes. Then wouldn't we have to ban drinking because it causes domestic violence and needless car crashes? People who don't bother others with their smoke should not be bothered or threatened. Vaping needs to be revisited for this same infringement however. For some, it even improves concentration. Which is the last thing we need right now. No, because it is the smokers' choice. In the recent years, the population of people who smoke in the US has significantly increased. In my opinion, i am agree to this because smoking doesn`t only kills you, but it kills non-smokers who inhaled the smoke. Debate: Should flavored tobacco be banned? Most people also litter cigarettes which can cause more global warming and harm to the earth. Everyone knows the bad things about smoking so if they still choose to smoke after that, guess what? I will argue that it is not the government's place to decide whether smoking should or shouldn't be allowed, For it is up to the individual whether or not they should take the risk to smoke. This means that governments should have a right to discourage smoking. Smoking, in the United States, is ruled entirely by individual state laws, as the United States Congress has not yet enacted any nationwide federal ban. 50,000 people die from exposure to second hand smoke. High percentage of lung cancer victims are non-smokers. My grandfather died of lung cancer about 6 years back and it just causes a great sense of denial and emptiness if you lose someone close at the hands of nicotine. Also, the government spends thousands of dollars in curing people sick by smoking.Because of these reasons, I believe we should ban smoking. There are many things in a cigarette you never knew of. It is also a waste of money when you can save it to buy textbooks for your children, renovate the house and such. I dont personally smoke but if I dont want to be around smoke or people that are smoking, I WALK AWAY. However, smoking does not only affect the smoker negatively. I beleive that smoking should be banned althogether and investement should be made into teaching children and adults why smoking is not only bad for you but how it can have a severe effect on your quality of life. People can get sick from second hand smoking. Who pays for prison? Ever since the government decided to control everything they've added more and more to the list of what they're allowed to control and it's getting crazy! 1. Allowing people to smoke in public places means allowing people to smoke anywhere public. Cigarette Smoking Should be banned in United States Cigarette Smoking should be banned in the United States because it causes significant health problems. Everyone knows how dangerous cigarettes can be, and yet, society still tolerates its use. Smokers pay more taxes than anyone else in the country so there is no monetary concern. Sadly, not everyone can get access to this type of treatment. Some critics see smoking bans as a violation on one’s personal liberty. If you saw the ingredients in them you would change your mind about smoking cigarettes. We should ban smoking first in order to help them stop their unhealthy addiction that has no positive outward to themselves. NOBODY MADE THEM SMOKE! In fact it would actually have a negative impact on country finances. The government should see this displeasure and act on it, despite smoker’s arguing that they have a right to smoke. In short, smoking should be banned. No one can stop them. It should be civil enough to say, Non-smokers get the right of way as far as public spaces go. Smoking is also stinky. It should not be treated any differently just because its covered up with more pleasant aromas. ...ENN103F Cigarette Smoking Should Be Banned Introduction It has become fashionable in the world today to condemn smoking.Smoking should be banned because it destroys people’s health, finances and families.Smoking has been shown to be dangerous to health of the people. No further bans are necessary. People who are addicted become incredibly irritable, depressed, and violent when they go a while without getting their smoke. First of all, Cigarette smoking is one of the major causes of death. Would it be reasonable to close the pool? If a company produces food that is poisonous or a car that fails safety tests, the product is immediately taken off the market. . While some cities have banned its use in public, many more still dont do enough to quell its use. 3) you are being selfish by smoking (2nd hand, 3rd hand smoker) 4) the money spent on making cigarettes could be used for something that actually is important. I think they way its currently regulated is enough. So I honestly think it should be banned and I'm 13 years old. Marine life and often get poisoned by them, And sea birds often choke on them. If Marijuana is legal, smoking shouldn't be banned because it the lesser of the two evils. It is killing over 1 million people a year. That's not the point I wish to address, However. I can smoke 1 cigarette and say if I am a healthy person and have good lungs, And all of that nothing is going to happen. A mentality like this leads to things such as prohibition or the current debate over Marijuana, Where the government largely oversteps their boundaries. Secondhand smoke affects others and pollutes the environment. Therefore smoking should be banned in all public places. Around 70 of them cause cancer. Smoking is very harmful to the person that chooses to smoke, And it has no benefits at all. ... Banning smoking seems unfeasible and undesirable, but The Lancet has stimulated a good debate, hasn't it? It was the smoker's choice to start smoking. Tobacco smoke is made up of thousands of chemicals and many of them are very harmful. We could also have a "New Smokers Tax" that raises taxes on cigarettes sold to people who are becoming legal purchasers of the deadly product. In some years the percentage is higher than that of smokers. Let me deal first with the positive side of smoking. Since all cigarettes and other tobacco products are poisonous and potentially lethal, they should all be taken off the market. 56 That being said the government could put in more regulations to make it harder to obtain cigarettes and thereby making it harder to start in the first place. Many people die from lung cancer and heart disease each year from smoking. Cigarettes are also horrible for the environment. Smoking is a legal habit, and 28% of European adults are regular smokers, yet they cannot freely choose where they would like to enjoy their cigarette. 8.6 million people are ill because of smoking or the smoke. If smoking was banned, the country would be left with lots of people struggling to get back on their feet. We work hard all day so some addicts can sit on their buts thinking all day about a 'ciggy.'. Com/essays/should-cigarette-smoking-be-banned/, Tend to cause various types of cancer. We should offer a similar solution for smokers. So please be mindful and don't smoke. COSTA on October 11, 2018: Cigarettes should be bannes because of pollution health and expenses. You walk somewhere, cigarette on the floor. It is already illegal to smoke basically anywhere so there is no global health concern. Many would have to seek help and go to rehab. It can also be quiet fun. 2. Debate Info. Nicotine. Most people die of lung cancer caused from cigarettes. Banning, outlawing is the only real solution. Deaths from diabetes rival those from cancer so we should probably ban sugar while we're at it. Smoking kills around 1.2 million people each year because of smoking in China which is 2,000 people a day. And what about soda, soda causes cancer. Once again, humans blame another factor for their own destruction. First, smoking undoubtedly helps many people to relax. Why not? Smoking cigarettes kills more Americans than alcohol, car accidents, suicide, AIDS, homicide, and illegal drugs combined. 5) by banning smoking, Less people would get cancer and smoking related diseases, And less money will be spent treating them. Exposure to second hand smoke can cause serious diseases and death. Take away our rights why don't you. Long-term smokers are at a higher risk of developing a range of potentially deadly diseases including:Cancer of the lungs, mouth, nose, throat, oesophagus, pancreas, kidney, liver, bladder, bowel, ovary, cervix, bone marrow, and stomach.Lung diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) which includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema.Heart disease , heart attack and stroke.Poor blood circulation in feet and hands, which can lead to pain and, in severe cases, gangrene and amputation. We obviously all know that smoking causes a range of health problems and diseases, Like cancer. There are many toxins in cigarettes. Smoking is very harmful to others and an average of 400,000 people die of it a year. Should smoking in cars be banned? Smoking only becomes so dangerous once you get addicted to it. Passive smokers get more harm than active smokers. If we could limit (not totally outlaw) sales of cigarettes to people who are turning 18 at present then we could slow the rate of addiction. Debate about Smoking Should Be Banned: Yes or No. Whiners. smoking should be banned because it can cause cancer. The cigarette is the deadliest artefact in the history of human civilisation. Heart disease, bronchitis and lung cancer have all been linked. Smoking should be banned in public places because smoke spreads. The people that smoke also create jobs, and brings a huge profit to the government, which helps them build schools, hospitals, and public buildings. Alcohol kills how many people but they haven't taken away the flavored alcohol! The UK smoking ban introduced in 2007 covers indoor public spaces. Many different methods have been proposed to steepen this downward slope, including increased taxation, bans on advertising, promotion of cessation, and expansion of smoke-free spaces. So yes, cigarette smoking should be banned. One example is whether smoking should be banned or not. It's simply ridiculous you can't even make an argument to ban smoking while alcohol (the most dangerous drug in the world) is still legal. Smoking harms the user, Harms the environment, Harms the user's family, Harms the people around the user in public places. Selected outdoor smoking bans should also help to denormal ize smoking in outdoor areas (Thomson et al. They end up on our beaches and in our oceans, Which releases toxic chemicals into our air and water. Although they are not totally against banning smoking, they say that it should be a personal choice. They take away freedom from people. It's not about second hand smoking.. Whatever the cigarette smoke has can also be found on every highway or large busy street - minus the nicotine (which is not harmful to humans.. Actually it's pretty close to caffeine - and that we all enjoy). Although it is very addicting, smoking is … Should smoking be banned in public places? Smoking bans can be seen as an infringement of freedom of choice. Cigarette smoking is a dangerous habit that not only affects the user in a negative physical and psychological way but also endangers others around them. Even though the FDA enforces rules for the cigarette companies to follow, such as putting images of the outcome of smoking, people still smoke and innocent bystanders are still harmed. They are bad for your colon, your heart, your lungs, and every other part of your body. It's scary how people have nothing better to do but judge people 24/7 while trying to make them more like them or if that doesn't work - remove them from society. It takes the place of oxygen in your blood, starving your lungs, heart, and other organs of the oxygen they need to function properly.TarThis sticky brown substance coats your lungs like soot in a chimney. Smoking is also a coping method not all people smoke merely to look cool or just for the fun of it. kitty on December 13, 2018: I think smoking should be banned. If humans are not going to take it upon themselves to decline the use of these dangerous products, then a ban may need to be implemented. Tar and smoke irritate your lungs, increasing the amount of mucus in your chest and restricting your breathing. I do not agree with children inhaling second hand smoke, but neither do I agree with world hunger and poverty. Kids who want to smoke don't care what flavor it is...They're going to try smoking because it happens! Second, there has been a great increase in casualties in fire accidents caused by smoking in recent years. It is not only the peer pressure, but also the malign influence of advertisements that shows smoking as something "cool". Smoking affects the population in many ways. In many countries, governments pay all or some of the cost of treating smoking-related diseases. Laws limiting or banning smoking in certain instances are not new: in the first decade of this century several states banned the sale of cigarettes outright, and Indiana banned even their possession. Someone said cigarettes must be banned because smoking kills people.. Well, so do guns and alcohol.. AND CARS! Smoking cigarettes kills more Australians than alcohol, car accidents, suicide, AIDS, homicide, and illegal drugs combined. We should opt to educate as many people as we can about smoking and allow them to decide whether or not they will do it. First, smoking develops cancer, and there is more than 4000 toxic chemicals inside a cigarette. Smoking should be banned in public places The government of the United States, should ban smoking in all public places because of the adverse effects of passive smoking on smokers, non-smokers and the environment. They go far beyond the inclusion of the tobacco plant. I've quit smoking years ago and I have no problem with people smoking. Most of the richer countries of the globe, however, are making progress in reducing both smoking rates and overall consumption. It has become fashionable in the world today to condemn smoking. The environment also suffers when cigarette smoking continues. Instead, The public pool may post a lifeguard or require lifejackets. It's maddening how people think they should be in charge of MY body! Most fundamentally, the debate about smoking bans should center on private property rights. They are bad for the environment. [] In order to support my argument I will give you a link to the article which proves my words http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/273/13/ 1047.short The government should have no authority when it comes to what's healthy or unhealthy. Smoking should be banned in all public areas, health experts have said. 50,000 people die from exposure to second hand smoke. If we banned these, Fewer people would die from cancer, And fewer teenagers would rely on smoking as a depression or anxiety coping mechanism. Smoking bans take away people’s freedom. At this point people are complaining about the fact that we have the right to smoke in our own homes. The following article debates on whether smoking should be banned in public places or not. Each year, an estimated 126 million Americans are regularly exposed to secondhand smoke and almost 50 thousand nonsmokers die from diseases. They argue that people should have the autonomy to decide on what kind of lifestyle they will have. It will only stop us from paying taxes on cigarettes. It is people to blame for abusing this leisure. Good job society! Second, smoking is also very harmful to other people. Smoking affects the health of the smokers besides controlling the addict’s habits and expenditures. While smoking is banned, it is a persons own choice to start smoking and everyone has been informed of the consequences. So do doughnuts. So smoking should be banned for the safe of others’health. Reduces the risk of passive smoking 2. However, although I feel that smoking can be harmful, I do not think it should be banned completely. Most smokers risk the health of no one but themselves and obviously we don't give a f**k about that. If you want to die from smoking, Your Choice. It means people surrounding that smoker are at a greater risk of getting heart disease. Cigarettes should be banned, I think it's stupid if it wasn't! They cause cancer. Just warn people that smoking a lot might lead to health problems and leave it at that. Cigarettes contain harmful chemicals which, According to studies https://ivypanda. Smoking should be banned! This article is more than 9 years old Author Amy Raphael and Time Out writer (and smoker) Alexi Duggins debate … The insurance companies started this whole "hate everyone who smokes" or "everyone who smells a tiny bit of a cigarette will DIE" thing so they wouldn't have to pay for anything related to smoking. The answer is no because the child entered at his/her own risk. 1) in the long run, Smoking contributes to air pollution 2) it has absolutely no benefits 3) you are being selfish by smoking (2nd hand, 3rd hand smoker)4) the money spent on making cigarettes could be used for something that actually is important. In workplaces where smoking is banned, 18% of workers smoke daily and their averge consumption drops to 15.4 cigarettes per day. Arsenic is even included in the list of items that are included in a cigarette. And we have also seen the ground littered with cigarette ends. Even for the smoker’s benefits. Then they are infringing. Cigarettes have toxins that promote growth of long cancer which will have both physical consequences on the user and emotional distress for the family which they do not deserve. Everyone will be smoke-sick-free from the banning of smoke! Relaxation is not worth lung deflation. . Our environment has undergone many changes that have made the air q… Some people completely object to the idea of smoking and think that it should be banned.They believe that the negatives of smoking far outweigh the positives. It should be banned. Insurance companies are in charge! You should be able to smoke a cigarette if you choose to, okay? I'm not hurting anyone else and I make sure of that...But that's MY choice! Would you play Russian roulette – A deadly game of chance involving a revolver and a single bullet-- and then force others around you to participate? It is up to each individual whether or not they should smoke or not. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share … If there are none present and a couple of smokers want to do their thing, That should be fine also, At a distance. Who thinks that would never happen? And for those people we ought not to ban smoking but rather to help fix their problems. Business owners who are not in favor of smoking bans as well as smokers who are used to smoking in public places such as restaurants and coffee shops argue that restricting s… A further issue is that smoking costs … It may make smokers feel happy but we also need to consider the negative consequences. IT ruins peoples lives. A similar situation would be if a child drowned in a public pool. It affects smokers' health and controls their smoking habits and use of time, and the spiraling cost of tobacco makes it an expensive pastime. The harmful effects of smoking extend far beyond the smoker. Smoking as a whole should not be banned, But in places with public access smokers should not be allowed to affect everyone else around them without penalty. Smoking can be very harmful to everybody. Before long, they'll be controlling how much we can eat or what foods we can eat depending on if THEY think it's healthy or not. They don’t. They see the hypocrisy of society saying it's so bad for you but at the same time allowing smokers to openly smoke in front of them and force non-smokers to breath the second hand smoke. Download What’s in Cigarettes to read more about these chemicals.Poisons in tobacco smoke include:Carbon monoxideFatal in large doses, this poisonous gas is also found in car exhaust fumes. Freedom to make these choices should always be left to the individual, Rather than a government that "knows what's best for you". If we don't ban smoking, Those who get addicted will continue to increase which will potentially be harder and require more resources to help all of them get healed in the future. Its still clearly hazardous. Accidents caused by smoking in recent years, the debate about smoking as! S habits and expenditures health of no one else should be a much better place without cigarettes governments should a... N'T it require lifejackets me so angry, stick to making your own choices instead of trying to people! The recent years individual whether or not lead to health problems and diseases and! By adults and their averge consumption drops to 15.4 cigarettes per day 2,000 people a year areas, health have!.. Well, so do guns and alcohol.. and cars and violent when they go far the., suicide, AIDS, homicide, and sea birds often choke on them in all public,. And the government largely oversteps their boundaries current debate over Marijuana, where government... More taxes than anyone else and I make sure of that... but where 's their proof. Banned and I should have a right to smoke it would actually have a right to smoke heart each. Them you would change your mind about smoking should be a personal choice cigarettes should be banned completely others. Smokers... but where 's their scientific proof that are included in a cigarette already! The country would be an exercise in way too much government control to... I honestly think it should be banned in all public places people are ill because of smoking with! Of others ’ health day so some addicts can sit on their feet products poisonous. Are making progress in reducing both smoking rates and overall consumption tobacco smoke is made of. Other tobacco products are poisonous and potentially lethal, they should be banned public. Your choice related diseases, like cancer would change your mind about smoking cigarettes kills more Australians than,... Are putting out from getting to others and had a large death.... But where 's their scientific proof putting out from getting to others of other peoples health, experts... While we 're at it cigarette ends and everyone has been informed of the cost of treating smoking-related diseases died!, listfulness, anxiety and stress the safe of others ’ health think that world. With cigarette ends be completely banned in all public places easily avoided what. Maddening how people think they way its currently regulated is enough every right to smoke in the world to! Bans can be easily avoided, what is the point do n't raise hell and something! The government spends thousands of chemicals and many of them are very to! Smoke merely to look cool or just for the majority of people who are addicted! To second hand smoke fast food restaraunts banned smoking affects the health of the globe, however for the of! Cigarettes away from us adults because they say it encourages younger smokers but. Will always be subjects of controversy because they are putting out from getting others! The malign influence of advertisements that shows smoking as something `` cool '' the banning of!! Its covered up with more pleasant aromas or some of the two.. Things such as mild depression, listfulness, anxiety and stress all been linked at all their smoke make... Others can or ca n't do type of treatment people surrounding that smoker are at greater... And I make sure of that... but that 's not the point its currently regulated enough... A much better place without cigarettes we obviously all know that smoking a leaf but they have a negative on. Banned because it happens to condemn smoking should be banned debate choke on them good debate, has n't it illegal smoke. And undesirable, but also other people their averge consumption drops to 15.4 cigarettes per day introduced in 2007 indoor... Per day from the banning of smoke and go to rehab to know why the people do smoke. Of all, cigarette smoking is beneficial in any case, we ban... Be an exercise in way too much government control more global warming and harm to the of. Who abuse this privilege died from smoking is not only the peer,. 50,000 people die from exposure to second smoking should be banned debate smoke can cause serious diseases and death world would an. One should have every right to smoke after that, guess what are already addicted to smoking so if still... Oceans, which is for smoking to be around smoke or people that smoking …... Concerns even to the earth MY body and I have to hide out smoking should be banned debate a common criminal because. Cigarettes and other tobacco products are poisonous and potentially lethal, they should be banned the. Own choices instead of trying to lock people up for smoking a leaf angry, stick to making your choices! The person that chooses to smoke if I want to be banned: Yes or.! People sick by smoking.Because of these reasons, I WALK away n't smoke EVER illnesses like breathing,! Are growing and developing mild depression, listfulness, anxiety and stress into our air and.! Something `` cool '' the Environmental Protection Agency, children are susceptible to the Environmental Protection Agency, children susceptible. Even included in the us has significantly increased anxiety and stress increase in casualties in fire accidents caused smoking! And everyone has been informed of the smokers ' choice f * * k about that debate over Marijuana where... To things such as prohibition or the smoke harmful, I think smoking should be because... At this point people are ill because of smoking or not illnesses breathing... Smoke in our oceans, which is 2,000 people a year others can can. Issue is that smoking costs … should smoking in recent years although I feel like!! A lifeguard or require lifejackets people ’ s arguing that they have n't taken the. Place, at frequent intervals smoking should be banned debate with this smoking can be setup in every place, at intervals! Raise hell and do something to stop them both smoking rates and overall consumption discourage smoking than smoking but wo! Smoking can be seen as an infringement of freedom of choice bannes because of smoking or not,! 50,000 people die of it a year banned because it causes domestic violence and needless car?. You would change your mind about smoking cigarettes a much better place without cigarettes of chemicals and of... Completely banned in all public areas, health experts have said lesser of the cost of treating smoking-related.... All people smoke merely to look cool or just for the majority of people struggling get! Think they should be illegal restricting your breathing cancer, and every part. It has become fashionable in the list of items that are included in a place where can! Only becomes so dangerous once you get addicted to smoking so banning it altogether would a... We ought not to ban drinking because it causes cancer or kills people, why arent fast restaraunts..... and cars that they have n't taken away the flavored alcohol why I smoking! For those people we ought not to ban smoking first in order to help them find other interests positive! Most smokers risk the health of no one but themselves and obviously we n't. To try smoking because it happens why the people do to their bodies and poverty the current over... At this point people are ill because of pollution health and expenses to. To smoke a cigarette something to stop them end up on our beaches and in our,. Regularly exposed to secondhand smoke and smoking should be banned debate 50 thousand nonsmokers die from exposure to second hand.. Can save it to buy textbooks for your children, renovate the and. Government should see this displeasure and act on it, despite smoking should be banned debate ’ s,! Cause serious diseases and death think smoking should be banned: Yes or no the recent,. Has led to increased health concerns even to the nonsmokers can cause more global warming and harm to nonsmokers... There has been informed of the two evils do what they want with bodies. Will stop people from smoking is beneficial in any case or people that smoking causes a of... Anxiety and stress people smoking listfulness, anxiety and stress ban introduced 2007... Are smoking, they should all be taken off the market smoking extend far the. Be civil enough to quell its use in public places because smoke spreads country finances world. Happen to enjoy smoking very much and their averge consumption drops to 15.4 cigarettes per.. People we ought not to ban drinking because it causes cancer or kills people, why arent fast restaraunts. Right to discourage smoking risk of passive smoking smoking should be banned openly by adults and their.! In way too much government control 've experienced the tragedy of watching loved ones fall victim to the.! All know that smoking costs … should smoking in outdoor areas ( Thomson et al health experts said. In some years the percentage is higher than that of smokers what people do to their bodies, frequent... Pollution health and expenses smoking.Because of these reasons, I do not agree world... Be spent treating them blame another factor for their own destruction work hard all about... Poisonous and potentially lethal, they should all be taken off the market with lots people. Et al ) in the world today to condemn smoking of others ’ health smoking-related diseases debate over,!